Hi Bill, you have a captured a good expression on the face and IMO it needs a bit more room at the bottom but is this due to the fact it's lying in a shallow depression? but the front legs appear to carry on out of frame. With that plain background this to me is crying out for a B&W conversion.
Clive,
Actually, the front legs weren't visible at all. As you said - she was lying in a shallow depression, plus the grass was pretty high.
I knew the framing on the one above would be a bit outside the norm, but I still like it. And of all the facial expressions I got out of her, I liked that one the best...
A more 'standard' composition (but a sleepier expression):
A more 'hunting' stance (but no eye contact):
The B&W idea sounds like a good one... I'll see if I can find some time tonight to work that up and share.
Thanks for the input!
- Bill
Last edited by ktuli; 3rd May 2012 at 02:15 AM.
As suggested, here are some B&W conversions and (upon Donald's suggestion) with the original lens vignetting returned to the image (as well as a miniscule amount of barrel distortion - I guess I could have left that correction turned on and only turned off the vignetting, but I'm running on 5 hours of sleep, so please forgive me).
Please provide your additional input on these new versions.
Additionally, their corresponding color versions above have regained their vignetting as well.
Thanks for viewing.
- Bill
Hi Bill,
I hope you don't mind, but I have tried a small edit on the first picture.
(Apologise for this lazy edit)
I did a bit of crop ( There is too much empty space on top, IMO), darken the grass and light a bit this kitten.
Anyway, I don't think the "standard b&w" is working, I think b&w will need more procesing, to make the ceetah to pop more.
Leo
Hi Bill, I agree with Leo that the Cheetah needs to "pop" a bit more in the B&W and his suggestion will work by lightening the "kitty" and darken the grass.