Oh Steve,
Please tell me you're not trying to read a monk's shopping list through a piece of wobbly glass that is several hundred years old?
I doubt you'll get that readable.
Cheers,
Yes it is probably expecting a bit much Dave and anyway I just thought it is 200% or 9000+ pixels or 900% bigger than this image. Would have been nice to be able to though.![]()
You need the software used in crime shows where they can recognize a a license plate number from outer space.
I was just curious John, it looks like new glass with a shopping list. The actual photo I wanted I couldn't get because it was between the pillars and even with highest iso I needed a tripod, and didn't like to place one on an eight hundred year old stone carving.
The window is on the left near the statue between the pillars.![]()
cheers AshwinIt is because I like dark in fact I couldn't get any films processed after leaving school where I did my own, because the machines discarded them as seriously underexposed.
The window is blue and the only light source apart from the dark cathedral behind, but I like the red tint. cheers![]()
Cheers John.Just for an experiment I thought I would take the first non blown frame and try to recreate the actual darkness or level of light. Well all of them were blown but this at 1/15 200 iso f8 temp 4200 fill 100 recovery 50 is how I remember the lighting and the window is blue as are all of them but maybe not as much as I've got some.
I didn't notice the light top left, but it wasn't much.Trying to simulate the atmosphere is very difficult, I don't want so much detail as atmosphere but preferably both.