Hi Steve,
Is the background SOOC or did you desaturate it?
Nice shot, I did wonder about an excess of space on right and a square crop, but I like the lead in lines from background branches both side that this has.
Cheers,
Background is sooc. I don't know what the deal is with the WB on these shots. Histograms say everything is good, and certain areas of the photos have a cast. Some areas had a green cast , some blue. The colors of the deer look good, and the backgrounds look very cool (blue). The grass and pine tree are giving a green reflection of some sort.........................? It's almost like i shot indoors with multiple light sources. This one isn't too bad, but the background looks a touch on the cool side.
I left a little more room on the right because the branch was a very important part of the composition and didn't look right as a stub.
And it isn't a square crop..............5/4
Great shot,Steve!
WB looks good to me.I'm viewing on a calibrated and profiled monitor.
BG colour looks good.
Thanks jim. This series of images had a few color issues due to the lighting, i guess. The backgrounds looked cool, the greens vibrant, and some of the shadow areas of the white had a green hue. At the same time, the right side of the histograms were even, showing a neutral WB. This image here, the background looks a touch on the cool side, but not bad.
Yes I can see that!
No, my apologies, that's me missing out (too many) words to save time (I was rushing, me bad)
To say what I was (fully) thinking; I did wonder about (there being) an excess of space on right and a (trying a) square crop, but I like the lead in lines from background branches both side that this has.
That's what I meant to say
Ever heard the phrase; "more haste, less speed"?
Cheers,
I agree this one isn't too bad - in fact I would say the background is pretty neutral, hence my thought it might have been desaturated (in the highlights, if nowhere else)
When I PP mine, perhaps I'll find similar issues, I know there's (understandably) a huge difference between those shot into the light and those not backlit.
Cheers,