Sure do.
And Shopping Malls; Schools; etc - mostly all 'public' enclosed areas have a 'policy' which is enforceable under law.
Here, the law regarding is mainly always is under 'The Enclosed Lands Act' or similarly titled State Legislation.
Funny, I was discussing this topic a few weeks ago with one of my daughters - she has a passion for some particular peculiar aspects of the law: it appears that the
Westfield Group have removed many if not all of the signage at the Malls' entrances which (used to) explain the prohibition of Photography within their Shopping Complexes.
Apparently and according to "informed sources" the "new look" Westfield Shopping Complexes want to ensure
'a positive customer experience' and apparently, burly security officers telling customers that they cannot take pictures was not an enriching customer experience - so the signage has been removed but the right to prohibit photography still exists.
I tend to carry a camera just about everywhere I go. And I have grey hair, so with that many flying hours up I am not that fussed and don't usually get ruffled easily.
In simple terms the laws are all similar in each State - the owner (or the Authority) has the right to prohibit or restrict Photography within the 'enclosed land' - that means whilst the Photographer is 'standing within the enclosed land'.
The law does not mean a person cannot carry a camera inside enclosed land, nor does it mean that the owner or authority has the right to look at, nor handle one's camera or look at the images in the camera.
Nor does the law mean the owner or authority has the right to instruct the deletion of any image created
before the instruction was given to cease making images, because Photography is prohibited.
It is interesting. Perhaps the rapid development of Mobile Phone Imaging has been the catalyst for the Westfield Group to change their thinking on a few things . . . I should go to the Library this afternoon after work and see what happens when I snap a photo of the new Librarian!
WW