Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Stubb's Falls, Arrowhead Provincial Park

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    48
    Real Name
    Tom

    Stubb's Falls, Arrowhead Provincial Park

    Not sure how this image was going to turn out. Wanted to instill the feeling of fast flowing water without making the water appear to rugged or silky smooth. Comments greatly appreciated.

    Stubb's Falls, Arrowhead Provincial Park

  2. #2
    Moderator Dave Humphries's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Windsor, Berks, UK
    Posts
    16,759
    Real Name
    Dave Humphries :)

    re: Stubb's Falls, Arrowhead Provincial Park

    Hmmm, it kinda achieves what you want Tom,

    There's just something about the composition that doesn't quite work for me. It is close though and I can't pin point a technical error.

    I think the problem is a combination of geology, water flow, colour palette, etc., simply trying a slightly different crop, or cloning odd things out, doesn't really satisfy my niggling feeling.

    That's why I don't shoot this type of scene myself, I'm just not skilled enough to 'see' the great compositions that occur in the natural world or patient enough to wait for the ideal time of day, time of year, weather, water flow, sub-water rock positions, background foliage, et al.

    That was no help at all, Dave

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    3,032
    Real Name
    Ole

    Re: Stubb's Falls, Arrowhead Provincial Park

    Tom, I think you got the water flow right, that is the way you designed it. I am not sure about the BG though. Maybe hone in on the rocks and the water only. Just a thought.
    Cheers Ole

  4. #4
    Moderator Manfred M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    22,298
    Real Name
    Manfred Mueller

    Re: Stubb's Falls, Arrowhead Provincial Park

    Tom - I find that the issue with this image is the composition, more so than how you have treated the flowing water.

    The water overwhelms the rest of the scene and there is so much of it that the balance between the static background and the flowing water seem out of kilter. Usually, the water is more of a finishing touch to a scene, than the main element of the image.

    One thing I tend to do when I photograph flowing water is to bracket my exposures (different shutter speeds), so that when I get home and start tweaking the image, I have different materials to choose from to build the final image.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Alaska
    Posts
    7,604
    Real Name
    Dan

    Re: Stubb's Falls, Arrowhead Provincial Park

    Similar to others' comments the composition isn't working for me. Also for the bit of water that you chose to dominate the image the blurring doesn't really add to the sense of motion IMO. White water in and of itself speaks to motion. When shooting smooth water then the concept may work better. Maybe it's just my pre-conceived notion but for rapids a ss that either freezes the motion completely or produces the silky effect is more effective.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    48
    Real Name
    Tom

    Re: Stubb's Falls, Arrowhead Provincial Park

    Thank you to everyone who replied, the fact is I feel the same way about the composition and think Dave's answers say it all.

  7. #7
    Wavelength's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Kerala, India
    Posts
    13,862
    Real Name
    Nandakumar

    Re: Stubb's Falls, Arrowhead Provincial Park

    I would like to see a bit more of greenery... further the double color of the rock is a bit discomforting for me....; leaving behind those points, i like you point

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Loading...