
Originally Posted by
William W
Frame #1 and Frame #3 have resulted in some comment and subsequent response:
Frame #1 “Donkey Cart in the streets”
Is neither strong as controlled narrative nor as an item of street journalism.
If the Purpose and Vision of the shot was controlled narrative of “Donkey Cart in the Street” then it is substantially weakened by the blur of the truck which has the dominant image area, causing a major distraction on the canvas: the shying away of the character at the centre of the image weakens the narrative further.
If the purpose of the image is a street shot and the intent was to use the blur of the van at juxtaposition to the (slow) speed of the cart, then those two elements would be better placed occupying opposing portions of the image real-estate and the cart would be better being driven and moving and not staged and posed.
Frame #3 - “Resilience”
Apart from a very long bow interpretation of expression in the Woman camera right, there is not any indicative of “resilience” in this shot; and her expression, without substantiating evidence from the scene could be: ‘reliance’ ‘dependence’ ‘worry’ ‘mourning’ ‘need’ . . . or many other emotions.
If the intent of the story were to capture ‘resilience’ (to overbearing heat) then the heat or the effects of heat must also be shown or implied in the shot, either overtly or covertly. There is no perspiration; there are no other people in less confined garb, there is no evidence of heat at all; there is no evidence that the shot is made in an area where it is always hot.
In all these regards the image is weak and does not support the title: yes it does in some minor manner support the commentary that these women just stepped off the river boat, but the argument that the expression is ‘resilience (to heat)’ seems a very thin argument when there could be so many other interpretations.
Also, the camera’s high Elevation weakens the image and the vision of the image – if ‘resilience’ is the story then the Subject Camera Right would be shown to be more resilient if she were not so far be below the camera’s elevation and the Subject Camera Left would be much more ‘resilient’ and also a much stronger supporter of ‘resilience’ if she were at Camera Level AND her HEAD was not cut by the dominate line of WHITE Bricks, which weakens both her and the theme of 'resilience' considerably.
WW