Connecting Stoerhead

[Donald]

When I've taken a similar approach to composition in the past, a number of folk have expressed the view that the inclusion of so much sky does nothing to enhance the image. Well, as you can see, I'm persisting with my idea that it can work.

Does it here, for you? All comment and critique welcomed.


40D, 24-70mm f/2.8L @ 70mm. ISO400. 1/60s@f5.6

[Shadowman]

It doesn't add much as the tonal range is limited except at the uppermost edges. I would be more tempted to bring some of that tone downward towards the center of the image near the electrical wires.

[Mike Buckley]

You might remember that I like compositions that include an expansive, plain sky such as this one. So, it should be no surprise that I like that compositional element here as well.

However, considering your caption, "Connecting Stoerhead," I wish the electrical wires were more prominent. Another issue is that the simple nature of the sky cries out to me for an equally simple landscape; I wish the formation (whatever it is) that rises above the land was not present, as it interrupts the line of poles. My guess is that you feel that formation draws the eye toward the center. If so, I agree but I think the poles by themselves would do an ample job of accomplishing the same goal.

[Donald]

Thank you, guys, for your helpful and, as always, thought-provoking comments.

I wish the formation (whatever it is) that rises above the land was not present, as it interrupts the line of poles.

Mike - You identify my concern about the image. I worked the location for about 45 minutes trying to find the shot that took those ruined buildings out of the scene. But I could not find an alternative composition with which I was satisfied. So it was a case of this composition or none. I chose to go with it.

The buildings are part of a WWII military camp. Given its location, with the route out to the North Atlantic just out of shot on the left, I suspect that this was a key strategic post in terms of tracking shipping and/or aircraft movement. I should do more research on what the camp was about.

[bnnrcn]

Hi Donald, IMO a lot of sky improves this image I'm sure you know very well that it is possible to make some levels adjustments in order to have a darker sky with more visible clouds, so I don't know if you left the sky so bright intentionally. I would prefer a darker one.

[dabhand]

I don't have the same concerns re the ruins as they make a secondary point of interest / cogitation, but I do feel the foreground could benefit by being a little lighter thus helping balance the sky but also helping to show how bland the land is too.

steve

[FootLoose]

The negative space works for me, Donald, but I agree with Mike about the buildings being distracting. My first thought on viewing the image, without knowing what the objects were, was that they should be cloned out because they subtract from the sense of isolation that I think you are aiming for with the line of poles against the vast open sky.