I like the image a lot - it really works for me, especially the cropped version.
I like the image a lot - it really works for me, especially the cropped version.
Ok....I'll be the dissenter.
I like the original crop. I like it because there is more of a separation between the viewer, me, and the guy far down the path. This adds a little feeling of desperation....I can't get to him. Which I like and I think totally makes the image. There's a stronger emotional component that's subtle at the same time.
Make sense?
Raj, as Bob said, it works. Personally I'm having a hard time deciding which crop I like most, so again I'm in agreement with Bob on #1. There is greater depth and distance which (IMHO) enhances the 'feel' of the image. I can see a kind of triptych, beginning with the tightest (closest) crop, the second image your second crop and the third image your first version. In other words, a photos side-by-side, the person receding further and further into the image. Just a thought....
I agree with Bob as well. The image is very captivating and the original crop, with the long foreground, really draws me towards the character in the distance. It is also a more unique composition to me because it places the horizon in the upper third of the image rather than towards the center. I also like the leaves captured on the path in the original crop, I think it adds to the overall feeling of the image. The other crops feel "cramped" to me in comparison. That's just my opinion. Great shot and PP!