Helpful Posts: P1120338 edited by Raymond Friedman, on Flickr
P1120309 filtered by Raymond Friedman, on Flickr
P1120317 radiate blkwht by Raymond Friedman, on Flickr
Results 1 to 7 of 7
Thread: The Elegant Butterfly
-
Today, 07:47 AM #1
- Join Date
- Jan 2015
- Location
- Maryland , U.S.
- Posts
- 1,253
- Real Name
- raymond
The Elegant Butterfly
-
Today, 08:48 AM #2
- Join Date
- Jan 2020
- Location
- Central France
- Posts
- 862
- Real Name
- David
Re: The Elegant Butterfly
Nice, I like the second and the b/w.
The first one is over exposed however, highlights blown out.
-
Today, 08:52 AM #3
- Join Date
- Aug 2015
- Location
- Scotland
- Posts
- 3,151
- Real Name
- Bill
Re: The Elegant Butterfly
+1 to what David posted
-
Today, 09:08 AM #4
- Join Date
- Jan 2015
- Location
- Maryland , U.S.
- Posts
- 1,253
- Real Name
- raymond
Re: The Elegant Butterfly
P1120337 redo by Raymond Friedman, on Flickr
-
Today, 09:15 AM #5
- Join Date
- Jan 2015
- Location
- Maryland , U.S.
- Posts
- 1,253
- Real Name
- raymond
Re: The Elegant Butterfly
A little more adjustments
P1120344 adjustments by Raymond Friedman, on Flickr
-
Today, 11:54 AM #6
- Join Date
- Apr 2015
- Location
- Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Posts
- 1,456
- Real Name
- André
Re: The Elegant Butterfly
Much better.
Originally Posted by selig1656
-
Today, 12:07 PM #7
- Join Date
- Jan 2020
- Location
- Central France
- Posts
- 862
- Real Name
- David
Re: The Elegant Butterfly
Yes, and no. The overall exposure of the shot is better, but you cant fix burned out over exposure in post. Once a section of an image is 100% luminosity, there is no information at all and reducing the exposure only turns featureless pure white into another featureless pure colour. The lost detail is lost forever.
Reply With Quote
