| | #1 |
| Junior Member | need some advice on this photo:
i would like to pick your brains,this weaver bird moved just as i took this shot,would you try and clone out the little bit of movement blur or leave it in? Last edited by Dave Humphries; 3rd November 2009 at 11:17 PM. Reason: add image inline |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2009 Location: Downey, CA
Posts: 115
| Re: need some advice on this photo:
Personally I wouldn't try to salvage this image. Birds are tough because they make all these herky-jerky motions in a seemingly random pattern, and it's hard to get them just at the moment when they go still. Sometimes I try burst mode to catch them, but since you used flash, that would not have worked here. You had a tough task here, with tough lighting and a squirmy subject, so don't beat yourself too badly.
|
| | |
| | #3 |
| Junior Member | Re: need some advice on this photo:
well i didnt think the picture was bad enough to toss as i was thinking of sketching him,besides i have a few decent shots of him anyway,i was just wondering if you had a decent picture and the animal moved a little would you clone out the slight blur or leave it in,you know would the blur add to the picture or subtract from it? |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Senior Member / Moderator Join Date: May 2008 Location: Windsor, Berks, UK
Posts: 2,374
| Re: need some advice on this photo:
There's a reasonable picture of a bird with its leg in its beak struggling to get out. How's this: All done with Elements 6: Set white to 220, grey to 1.3, Black to 4 Local Contrast Enhance (20%, 63px, 0th) Bit of Focus Magic (Blur, Auto; 1px) Crop for a composition Clone out a few bits sticking into frame Sharpen (USM 115%, 0.3px, 8th) Obviousy would have been better with the fullsize pic, but hey, now there's a script for you to follow ![]() Hope you like it, and that it helps, Last edited by Dave Humphries; 4th November 2009 at 08:12 PM. |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 218
| Re: need some advice on this photo:
Got it Dave; I couldn't see anything wrong with the original apart from being small. I can't see that it is all that blurred but a faster shutter speed helps. But anyway, small creatures move fast so I wouldn't think anything less than 1'/250 as good enough to catch something doing something different. But then it all depends on focal length and how steady you are I suppose. By the way it is a colourful pic and easy on the eyes. Last edited by arith; 4th November 2009 at 11:22 PM. Reason: error |
| | |