Now that I finally have my replacement photo editing computer up and running, I'm going through the photos I took while teaching myself to use the OM-1 Mark II. I took this one to try out the computational ersatz ND filter. Yet another waterfall photo, but I composed it a little differently than most, and I was struck by the contrast between the rocks on the two sides. (I toned down this contrast quite a bit by burning some of the rocks on the left, but I left most of it.) I've lost track, but I don't think I posted this yet. I'm not sure that there is enough there there, but for what it's worth:
Helpful Posts: 0
Results 1 to 3 of 3
Thread: Enough there there?
-
15th December 2025, 07:50 PM #1
- Join Date
- Dec 2011
- Location
- New England
- Posts
- 9,173
- Real Name
- Dan
Enough there there?
-
15th December 2025, 08:15 PM #2
- Join Date
- Jan 2020
- Location
- Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Posts
- 490
- Real Name
- Len
Re: Enough there there?
Dan, interesting. The in camera ND filter seems to give quite good results. At least it obviates the need to fit a screw in filter to the lens......
-
Yesterday, 05:35 PM #3
- Join Date
- Mar 2025
- Location
- Setúbal - Portugal
- Posts
- 301
Re: Enough there there?
Dan, this is yet another one of those photographs that reveal your mastery of the camera across various aspects. I loved seeing how you explored the built-in ND filter, the result is truly surprising and demonstrates notable practical utility.
I have nothing more particular to add about this image, except that I adore it: I find it captivating, with that light coming from behind that gives an irresistible and engaging detail.
Cheers !
Reply With Quote
