Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 24 of 24

Thread: Tamron 150-600mm

  1. #21
    rpcrowe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Southern California, USA
    Posts
    17,394
    Real Name
    Richard

    Re: Tamron 150-600mm

    Over the years, Romy has experimented with using multiple tele-converters in shooting his wonderful bird images.

    Tell you the truth, I haven't paid that much attention to his surfing photography.

    Here is one setup that I remember.

    http://www.pbase.com/liquidstone/image/59586426

    He has since sold the Sigmonster and works with other lenses.

    I worked for a long time in the Subic Bay, Philippines area, where Romy has done much of his photography. I never ventured into the jungle there. I don't really regret not doing so because I thought that it might be dangerous. Anyway, at the time, I was shooting film with a Canon DSLR and the longest lens I owned was 200mm.

  2. #22
    Shadowman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    WNY
    Posts
    36,717
    Real Name
    John

    Re: Tamron 150-600mm

    Quote Originally Posted by rpcrowe View Post
    Over the years, Romy has experimented with using multiple tele-converters in shooting his wonderful bird images.

    Tell you the truth, I haven't paid that much attention to his surfing photography.

    Here is one setup that I remember.

    http://www.pbase.com/liquidstone/image/59586426

    He has since sold the Sigmonster and works with other lenses.

    I worked for a long time in the Subic Bay, Philippines area, where Romy has done much of his photography. I never ventured into the jungle there. I don't really regret not doing so because I thought that it might be dangerous. Anyway, at the time, I was shooting film with a Canon DSLR and the longest lens I owned was 200mm.
    That is a monster.

  3. #23
    ajohnw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    S, B'ham UK
    Posts
    3,337
    Real Name
    John

    Re: Tamron 150-600mm

    Once they get that big maybe an apo telescope would be a better option. I doubt if the AF would work on that set up due to light levels. It wouldn't on the telescope either.

    I have one. F5.95 655mm focal length. It's about that long too. Weight 4.5kg. There is a lens to put near the focal plane to flatten the image as well to cover a 35mm frame. Coarse and extra fine focusing. There could be a problem these days. It might need a camera with an anti aliasing filter. No F stops other than wide open or fit a smaller aperture to the front which has am 110mm dia lens.

    The one I have isn't made any more but I think this ones still is. A bit more expensive than mine.

    http://www.williamoptics.com/telescopes/flt110_spec.php

    I tried to find a picture of the "lens" that the paparazzi sometimes use if they really can't get close. Royals on holiday etc. Meade SCT's. Google will show what these are. Available in all sorts of sizes but I understand the 10" F10 is popular as it's "manageable" the 14" is a bit heavy. 10" f10 = 100" focal length, 2,540mm. Near diffraction limited. People have bought the 6 and 8" F10 versions for bird watching. F10 might not need an anti aliasing filter.

    I've often thought of trying this with a smaller telescope and did have one that might be suitable. A 75mm F6 but still heavy. It wasn't being used though so I sold it.

    John
    -

  4. #24
    Shadowman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    WNY
    Posts
    36,717
    Real Name
    John

    Re: Tamron 150-600mm

    John,

    Have you tried using that 655mm for video?

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •