Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Not Good But I Think It Is Cool

  1. #1
    Ziggy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    3,242
    Real Name
    Jim

    Not Good But I Think It's Cool

    Not Good But I Think It Is Cool
    Last edited by Ziggy; 27th August 2015 at 08:06 PM.

  2. #2
    Shadowman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    WNY
    Posts
    36,717
    Real Name
    John

    Re: Not Good But I Think It's Cool

    Very cool!

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    289
    Real Name
    Jim

    Re: Not Good But I Think It's Cool

    What do you mean not good? I think it is very good. The flower and main butterfly are in good focus, the OOF butterflies add some life and movement to the scene, color and framing look good. What's not good?

  4. #4
    IzzieK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Chesterfield, Missouri/Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    17,827
    Real Name
    Izzie

    Re: Not Good But I Think It's Cool

    Jim is a learner like me...sometimes even if it looks good, he needs some more opinion...that's my take...

    Moving on, Ziggy...you are getting your creative juice working. These is really a beautiful rendition from the norm...

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Philippines
    Posts
    12,181
    Real Name
    Brian

    Re: Not Good But I Think It's Cool

    Way cool, seriously good.

  6. #6
    Ziggy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    3,242
    Real Name
    Jim

    Re: Not Good But I Think It's Cool

    Thanks all for the encouraging words.

    Wish I could have caught better detail in the two in flight.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    289
    Real Name
    Jim

    Re: Not Good But I Think It's Cool

    Yes, a bit more light on the bodies and a bit less flutter so the bodies are sharp or nearly sharp with a bit of motion on the wings would have been near perfection, IMHO.

    Hey Izzie, I had another opinion :-) Actually, I have many, but they have nothing to do with the picture.

  8. #8
    Ziggy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    3,242
    Real Name
    Jim

    Re: Not Good But I Think It's Cool

    Thanks Jim and I agree about the photo.

  9. #9
    DanK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    8,648
    Real Name
    Dan

    Re: Not Good But I Think It's Cool

    Good capture, and a very unusual image.

    Wish I could have caught better detail in the two in flight.
    I think you are being too hard on yourself.

    Did you use flash? I'm guessing not, from the lighting. That would have helped with the motion, although it might have made the closest too bright relative to the one in focus. Beyond that, I think the limited sharpness of the closer ones just reflects the small DOF at macro distances, and there isn't much you can do about that when things are moving. I doubt you could have gotten all three in sharp focus.

  10. #10
    IzzieK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Chesterfield, Missouri/Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    17,827
    Real Name
    Izzie

    Re: Not Good But I Think It's Cool

    Quote Originally Posted by Jimr1961 View Post
    Yes, a bit more light on the bodies and a bit less flutter so the bodies are sharp or nearly sharp with a bit of motion on the wings would have been near perfection, IMHO.

    Hey Izzie, I had another opinion :-) Actually, I have many, but they have nothing to do with the picture.
    Can you please PM me of your opinion so we do not get in the way of Ziggy's post here...?
    Thanks...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •