Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 41 to 45 of 45

Thread: 53Mp canon is it a step too far

  1. #41

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    6,956
    Real Name
    Ted

    Re: 53Mp canon is it a step too far

    Quote Originally Posted by Venser View Post
    In theory, [practice] and theory are the same, in [practice] they are not.

    These discussions always tickle my fancy since people rip on me for selling my D700 and D810 and moving entirely to the m43 world. I still print things at 24"x36" and no one can tell it's not full frame.

    I've made 5'x7' prints with my D700
    5'x7' ?

    If I had a D700, I too could move to a G1 (12MP to 12MP). I could even move to a GH2 (16MP) and print even finer. So I'm not quite sure what your point is, sorry.

  2. #42
    Venser's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    184
    Real Name
    Venser

    Re: 53Mp canon is it a step too far

    Quote Originally Posted by xpatUSA View Post
    If I had a D700, I too could move to a G1 (12MP to 12MP). I could even move to a GH2 (16MP) and print even finer. So I'm not quite sure what your point is, sorry.
    The point is many people talk about resolution and worry about MPs when they don't print anything larger than wallets. The D700 is 12MP and with some upsampling I was able to print large, really large, without the density of MPs mattering a lick. If Canon ever offers a 53MP camera, many people will pick it up because it's new, but the vast majority will never need that much information.

  3. #43

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    6,956
    Real Name
    Ted

    Re: 53Mp canon is it a step too far

    Quote Originally Posted by Venser View Post
    The point is many people talk about resolution and worry about MPs when they don't print anything larger than wallets. The D700 is 12MP and with some upsampling I was able to print large, really large, without the density of MPs mattering a lick.
    So that really was 5' by 7' mentioned in your previous post? I'm highly impressed!

    That would be like, 4256px wide at 60 dpi, or re-sampled 8512px at 120 dpi, or something like that?

    Please forgive my confusion because I don't print anything at all . . .
    Last edited by xpatUSA; 29th January 2015 at 06:06 PM.

  4. #44
    Mark von Kanel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Cornwall
    Posts
    1,861
    Real Name
    Mark

    Re: 53Mp canon is it a step too far

    Quote Originally Posted by chauncey View Post
    I would question why our time is being spent trying to educate someone that lacks the desire/knowledge
    to do high end shoots. It's a different ball game altogether.
    One would ask, what is the point of such a comment other than to belittle someone?

  5. #45

    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Mumbai, India
    Posts
    184
    Real Name
    Mrinmoy

    Re: 53Mp canon is it a step too far

    Quote Originally Posted by JR1 View Post
    I think that is wrong, why does wildlife photography need any more cropping than anything else, you use the appropriate lens say 400 to 600
    I mean to say when that zoom lens is no in budget.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •