Helpful Posts:
Results 1 to 9 of 9
Thread: Daguerreotype Look
-
24th January 2015, 07:11 PM #1
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
- Location
- Southern California, USA
- Posts
- 17,394
- Real Name
- Richard
Daguerreotype Look
-
24th January 2015, 08:32 PM #2
- Join Date
- Dec 2009
- Location
- WNY
- Posts
- 36,717
- Real Name
- John
Re: Daguerreotype Look
Nicely done.
-
24th January 2015, 08:42 PM #3
- Join Date
- Feb 2010
- Location
- Victoria Australia
- Posts
- 2,634
- Real Name
- Kay
Re: Daguerreotype Look
The processing really does suit the subject very well indeed.
The only ? Is the 'bump' in the wall from where the pipe was, but having said that if you didn't post the original, maybe would I have even noticed it?
Nice work.
-
24th January 2015, 10:27 PM #4
- Join Date
- May 2012
- Location
- northern Virginia suburb of Washington, DC
- Posts
- 19,064
Re: Daguerreotype Look
I like the look. I've never seen a color Daguerreotype so what is your source for how one would typically look?
-
24th January 2015, 10:32 PM #5
- Join Date
- Dec 2013
- Location
- Chesterfield, Missouri/Melbourne, Australia
- Posts
- 17,827
- Real Name
- Izzie
Re: Daguerreotype Look
Very nice, Richard -- it really suits this type of photo. Well done...
-
24th January 2015, 10:51 PM #6
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
- Location
- Southern California, USA
- Posts
- 17,394
- Real Name
- Richard
Re: Daguerreotype Look
Looking back, that was a hand colored Daguerrotype look. Here is one with no color...
Here is another hand colored Daguerrotype...
And this is listed as a tintype
I am looking forward to attending a Civil War Reenactment in Vista, California in March. In the interest of looking authentic, I am going to shoot at least some of the imagery at very slow shutter speeds (tripod mounted) and shoot in monochrome using the blue built-in filter.
The wet plate emulsions used during the Civil War Era required very long exposures (which was why so many images of the dead were shot - they didn't move) and the emulsions were blue sensitive....Last edited by rpcrowe; 25th January 2015 at 12:24 AM.
-
24th January 2015, 11:21 PM #7
- Join Date
- Dec 2009
- Location
- WNY
- Posts
- 36,717
- Real Name
- John
Re: Daguerreotype Look
Nice additional edits. For the future and current shots, do you utilize noise in your images, perhaps allowing noise during initial capture or applying afterwards?
-
25th January 2015, 01:29 AM #8
- Join Date
- Dec 2012
- Location
- Alaska
- Posts
- 7,604
- Real Name
- Dan
Re: Daguerreotype Look
Those are cool, Richard.
-
25th January 2015, 04:04 AM #9Moderator
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
- Location
- Ottawa, Canada
- Posts
- 21,956
- Real Name
- Manfred Mueller
Re: Daguerreotype Look
It's too bad they don't look like real Daguerreotype images, but they do look interesting. I had an opportunity to see someone's collection of Daguerreotypes earlier this week.
Daguerreotype used a highly polished metal (copper) surface that was coated with silver. This was exposed to iodine (or later bromine was used to increase light sensitivity) to create a silver halide. After exposure to light, the plate was exposed to mecury vapours (not a healthy process) to develop the image and then it was placed in a sodium thiosulphate bath to dissolve the unexposed silver salts.
If you ever look closely at a Daguerreotype, you can see both a positive and negative image, depending on the angle that you held it. The material was also orthochromatic, i.e. sensitive to blues and greens, but not reds.
Reply With Quote