The light turned on last night, perhaps my lens cap came off, and I think I now do understand “crop factor” and focal length.
If I were to say the specs of the sensor is much more important than the focal length of the lens, would that make sense? Will you understand what I am aiming at?
If my theory is wrong, photographers are probably the most ignorant idiots on earth. I am serious. Why would you spend $5000.00 on a FF camera whilst a “crop sensor” camera of $2000.00 will give you more “reach”, with the same lens, rendering the same quality of image? Does that make sense?
Thanks “Wizard” for bringing this up again.