| Re: Exposure Compensation vs. ISO setting jni, your question is the same exact question I was researching when I found this excellent site, and yes, the camera handles EC and ISO very differently, depending on the camera settings.
Changing ISO amplifies the electronic signal generated by the sensor for a given amount of light.
EC changes the amount of light that reaches the sensor (when ISO is set to a fixed value)by either changing the exposure or changing the aperture.
If you have your camera set in full "auto" mode, there may not be a difference between the 2 compensations functions, as my E3 will adjust ISO (in auto) to achieve exposure compensation, over a range of ISO set in the menu, but for fixed ISO, or outside that range, it adjusts speed or aperture, depending on the shooting mode.
So, what difference does it make? In most circumstances, increasing the ISO setting introduces more noise, whereas slight underexposure can be corrected in processing with minimal quality effect.
In McQ's tutorials, there is a better explanation of ISO (Noise, part 1) and EC (Camera metering).
JPEG vs RAW? Depends on your JPEG algortihm and settings. Both options allow you to correct for exposure or noise, but RAW has more original data, so you stand a better chance of correcting defects. Again, McQ has a nice tutorial on RAW.
(Just a note on your example -- to overexpose by one f stop by adjusting ISO, you would have to change from 200 to 400.) |