Re: Submitted for peer review
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Abitconfused
Ken is one of my least favourite authors on the internet, mostly because he seems to confuse opinion with fact. First of all the article is dated January 2009. As I recall, the first high quality. small carriage photo printer, the Epson Stylus Pro 3800 was released that month and it completely changed the quality of what could be done at home.
Pixels do count more for printing than for what is posted on the internet, so Rockwell's advice is not particularly good for a print maker. In other articles he has dismissed using anything other than sRGB or shooting raw without explaining the advantages and disadvantages of his advice.
Re: Submitted for peer review
Not only that. I have discovered that there is such a thing as a 75mm lens. Pass me one will ya?
Re: Submitted for peer review
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Manfred M
Ken is one of my least favourite authors on the internet, mostly because he seems to confuse opinion with fact. . .
Repeating and reiterating many of the internet authors' scripts in fact adds to the 'value' of many unsubstantiated, erroneous and sometimes, factually incorrect statements.
It is unfortunate, and a loss to quality education, that, with the advent of the internet, we have seen rise of many authors who publish works, often for sale, without: sound research and providing due dilligence and referencing to first and second sources and move direct to publishing, without providing several drafts for adequate proof reading by autoritative sources.
WW
Re: Submitted for peer review
So, to summarize for all our loyal followers... If you want to print some really nice looking images, even up to 11 x 17, but don't want to spend a lot of money, visit the link here: https://edruthphoto.com/workflow/ I have even included a more colorful target, here: https://edruthphoto.com/target-two/.
Re: Submitted for peer review
Recently updated with additional information and improvements!
Re: Submitted for peer review
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Melatcanam
I find the collaborative approach to creating a winning tactic for your team truly commendable. It's evident that you value the input and expertise of each team member, fostering a sense of unity and shared responsibility.
Que ?
Re: Submitted for peer review
Quote:
Originally Posted by
pschlute
Que ?
Spammer. Taken care of...
Re: Submitted for peer review
Over to you again Manfred !
Re: Submitted for peer review
Quote:
Originally Posted by
pschlute
Over to you again Manfred !
Indeed.
I think Manfred missed your message Peter - The embedded link in Post #28 sparked many warnings from my Server's Firewall.
I'll send him a PM...
Happy New Year to all at CiC
WW
Re: Submitted for peer review
Quote:
Originally Posted by
William W
Indeed.
I think Manfred missed your message Peter - The embedded link in Post #28 sparked many warnings from my Server's Firewall.
I'll send him a PM...
Happy New Year to all at CiC
WW
Hmmm, my post shows as #28. I am sure Manfred deleted the posts from the spammer.
Happy new year to all too.
I have not been posting much of late. I had my first cataract operation in November and the second one done this week. Hopefully in a month or so i will be out taking snaps and posting again.
Re: Submitted for peer review
Quote:
Originally Posted by
pschlute
Hmmm, my post shows as #28. I am sure Manfred deleted the posts from the spammer.
He did remove it, on Jan 24th, doing so bumped your post to #28.
Good luck with your recovery.
WW
Re: Submitted for peer review
Quote:
Originally Posted by
William W
Good luck with your recovery.
Thanks Bill. I feel I am on the final couple of laps.