Not street photography, but a technically bad (for well known historical reasons; the lab totally blew developing the film).
Regardless, an extremely strong emotional impact...
https://pro.magnumphotos.com/Asset/-2S5RYDDCAI4.html
Printable View
Not street photography, but a technically bad (for well known historical reasons; the lab totally blew developing the film).
Regardless, an extremely strong emotional impact...
https://pro.magnumphotos.com/Asset/-2S5RYDDCAI4.html
Thank you for your response.
I was not misrepresenting what you wrote.
The meaning of the first sentence of Post #18, is clear, to me: the paragraph is well constructed with that lead sentence acting as the definitive of the argument's premise, text book style, as we were taught to construct any well managed written argument.
Misunderstanding what you meant, however, is a different kettle of kippers.
(to me) Your Post #20 conveys a much different meaning to the meaning of your Post #18.
I believe that I now understand exactly what you mean, (and originally meant) and I see no need to discuss further - thanks again for taking the time to expand and explain.
WW
Aside -
Manfred, I'd usually issue a wide berth when it comes to 'categories' . . . but I am not a Librarian and whilst I appreciate the genius of that man Melvil Dewey, I get an headache thinking about how he was thinking about allowing for slots of things that had not yet been thought about . . .
I reckon, that, for the sake of general discussion -
'War Photography' is just 'Street Photography' on a different Street.
WW