2018 Project 52, 1st quarter by Rudi

Thanks all for the comments.

@Judith: sometimes I need a second pair off eyes to see the obvious, thanks for pointing that out !!

@Sandy: The third one is also my favourite. Trying to create more 'dynamic' lighting. Probably easy for the experienced, but for me, it took quiet a few trial and errors, fiddling around with lightposition, mini-reflectors, mini-flags, mini snoot etc. before I got more or less what I had in my mind.

"on average..." it depends, as usual. The number off frames are included in the exif data, but I will include them in the post itself next time.
The first one w13 is 50 frames, the second 100 and the third 35 frames.
For the second one, it would have been better to shoot at f2,8, but than the stepsizes would be too small, for my current set-up, to do comfortably by hand.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rudi

@Sandy: The third one is also my favourite. Trying to create more 'dynamic' lighting. Probably easy for the experienced, but for me, it took quiet a few trial and errors, fiddling around with lightposition, mini-reflectors, mini-flags, mini snoot etc. before I got more or less what I had in my mind.

"on average..." it depends, as usual. The number off frames are included in the exif data, but I will include them in the post itself next time.
The first one w13 is 50 frames, the second 100 and the third 35 frames.
For the second one, it would have been better to shoot at f2,8, but than the stepsizes would be too small, for my current set-up, to do comfortably by hand.

---

Hi Rudi - I hadn't looked to see if the EXIF was included. Lots of the photos on CIC's website do not include it and I've gotten sloppy about clicking and double checking because I am disappointed so many times when it isn't there. But yours is and I appreciate it. :) I also spotted where the frame count is listed now that I know what to look for! And yes, I really like the third one's glow and its detail. It is eye catching and very pretty!

Thanks for replying! :)