That looks better to me, Joe. And the canoe seems to be in a more pleasing position being just to the right of centre now.
Printable View
That looks better to me, Joe. And the canoe seems to be in a more pleasing position being just to the right of centre now.
Sail boat circling, waiting for the bridge to raise so it can sail out into Lake Ontario.
http://i63.tinypic.com/2im5oit.jpg
As the Hamilton lift bridge goes up it can move under and through
http://i66.tinypic.com/fdxbua.jpg
Finally past, it can go through the rest of the canal and into the Lake.
http://i63.tinypic.com/2i67aw.jpg
http://i67.tinypic.com/6gbtyr.jpg
This is also from Hamilton Harbour; I posted this to see comments about the space in front of this boat being smaller than the space behind. I know the 'rule' is that I should leave more room for the boat to sail(?) into, but I preferred the composition which maintained the boat-wash. I actually wanted to save more of the boat-wash, and delete more room from the front, more like this..
http://i65.tinypic.com/2hqgq36.jpg
The next shot is of a bridge in the Grist Mill estate in St. Carharines.
http://i68.tinypic.com/2q2r62h.jpg
From Balls Falls Ontario.
Hand held.
http://i68.tinypic.com/2epolsw.jpg
Shutter speed 1/320
and
I tried to make the water more silky with 1/30" but did not have my tripod so I could not extend the exposure or I could have added a filter and done something better.
http://i64.tinypic.com/21ci4py.jpg
Really like the colors of the structure in post #82.
Post #83, both would work with a bit less water, nice series. The bridge shot is okay but some details should be brought out of the shadows.
Post #84, you can try some of these camera holding techniques as described by photographer Joe McNally.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EDsx3-FWfwk
You have obviously been working with some difficult harsh lighting conditions with these shots. The second and third images from #82 work particularly well.
The last one was something of an impossible situation. If you went any slower you would have probably run into subject movement problems regarding the leaves. As it is, I think I would have preferred a much faster shutter speed to freeze the water. But would that have required too wide an aperture resulting in a loss of focus depth?
I meant the second image of post#84, Joe, where even if you had used a tripod for a slow shot of the water you would probably have had some motion blur from the leaves moving around.
All nice images :)
Photoshop CS and CC versions have a very good focus stacking option, Joe. I use it a lot.
Takes a few minutes of thought to work out how to access everything and get it to operate easily but once you have had a bit of practice it is easy to use.
Sometimes I do take handheld shots for stacking but you do need to allow a bit of extra space around the edges for alignment of layers to accommodate a bit of camera wobble. Doesn't always work but you have nothing to lose by giving it a try.
Trying my first 'focus blending' attempt. This test is more a learning on how to do it and to learn from the mistakes.
I tried to get some plant material in the foreground, the geese in mid, and the trees on the far bank of the water in background. For all shots I used the tripod, I did not think of the geese moving about, which of course they did.
This is the result of the merge of three shots.
http://i64.tinypic.com/206kdfo.jpg
Your first effort looks good to me! :)
Thanks Sandy: the foreground seems out of focus to me. I was focussing manually so I can t blame the camera 😎