The greatest thing since sliced bread...video in a DSLR

I would guess it would be easier getting them into the venue, but you would look very strange holding up a DSLR for the duration of the song. Usually, the rules are printing on the tickets and serves as the legal parameters for video/photographic rights. I would think if the event is sponsored by a corporation then the ban on video equipment would apply.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Colin Southern

I remember when video capability was introduced to high-end models there was concern that since video rights and photographic rights were usually different contracts at major events, photographers may not be allowed to use these new "all in one" cameras. Does anyone know if this turned out to cause any issues in the end?

Personally I get frustrated that I can't even use a still camera at most major events.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Shadowman

I would guess it would be easier getting them into the venue, but you would look very strange holding up a DSLR for the duration of the song. Usually, the rules are printing on the tickets and serves as the legal parameters for video/photographic rights. I would think if the event is sponsored by a corporation then the ban on video equipment would apply.

---

Around here they put some of them on the ticket and then "refer to our website for the full terms and conditions" - which generally has a few thousand pages of 4 point text that basically says "you have no rights - and are entitled to nothing!" :(

I will add my two cents worth on the subject.

I have found that when a product is modified, enhanced, changed, what ever term you want to use, to perform a second task, usually there is a dimished quality in each task since compromises need to be made. Also, it adds complexity to the product which can mean easier failures.

I have also found, and I will generalize a bit here, that most people who shoot video shoot it of inademint objects. They move the camera to get the motion they feel is needed.

If I want to shoot video, which I have done in a previous life, I will but a dedicated video camera and appropriate microphones.

It seem that going forward it will become increasingly difficult to but a camera that is for still photography.

Just my thoughts on the subject.

Larry

http://www.petapixel.com/2010/05/17/...-airs-tonight/
I haven't seen the episode yet but I guess we can judge for ourselves. I agree with you that a dedicated video camera should be the standard, but most users don't expect to get award winning captures, just look at what is posted on youtube.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ldunnvt

I will add my two cents worth on the subject.

I have found that when a product is modified, enhanced, changed, what ever term you want to use, to perform a second task, usually there is a dimished quality in each task since compromises need to be made. Also, it adds complexity to the product which can mean easier failures.

I have also found, and I will generalize a bit here, that most people who shoot video shoot it of inademint objects. They move the camera to get the motion they feel is needed.

If I want to shoot video, which I have done in a previous life, I will but a dedicated video camera and appropriate microphones.

It seem that going forward it will become increasingly difficult to but a camera that is for still photography.

Just my thoughts on the subject.

Larry

---