Quote:
Originally Posted by Colin Southern
do you like to add this to your "photoshop 30-second Makeovers" sir?
wow! it's my honor sir if you add... (is my interpretation correct? pardon me, im a filipino).
noise on long exposure
Printable View
-
22nd March 2010, 08:45 AMbelongRe: noise on long exposure
-
22nd March 2010, 09:23 AMColin SouthernRe: noise on long exposure
Wasn't quite sure which direction to push the colours - so here's what I finally decided on ... hope you like it!
https://www.cambridgeincolour.com/fo...0&d=1269249702 -
22nd March 2010, 09:51 AMbelongRe: noise on long exposure
wow!
amazing! it's so lively and the colors are outstanding...
i wish i know how you did that sir.
i like it very much! -
24th March 2010, 10:56 PMTerry TedorRe: noise on long exposureSorry, not trying to be contrary... Do you have a reference I can refer to? Thanks.Quote:
Originally Posted by Colin Southern
-
25th March 2010, 03:30 AMColin SouthernRe: noise on long exposureHi Terry,Quote:
Originally Posted by Terry Tedor
"Virtually all third-party RAW file software programs, such as Adobe’s Camera Raw™
software, will ignore in-camera settings such as High ISO Noise Reduction. "
http://www.usa.canon.com/dlc/control...articleID=1407
If it were something that was applied to the RAW capture then it wouldn't be able to be ignored by PP software.
To be honest, something that camera manufacturers don't tell you is that potential increases in signal-to-noise ratios are offset by the inherant increase in noise due to higher pixel densities - and yet - on latest generation cameras they STILL come up with higher ISO modes - so "how do they do it" ... the answer they don't want you to hear is that it's mostly done with more agressive de-noising available on say, Digic IV -v- Digic III - which only applies to JPEGs. So many people shooting RAW at high ISO are scratching their heads wondering why their high-ISO shots are so noise compared to the sample shots they're seeing on the web.