Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345
Results 81 to 83 of 83

Thread: A house shot in JPEG. I had forgotten how much you can do in RAW

  1. #81
    xpatUSA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    3,397
    Real Name
    Ted

    Re: A house shot in JPEG. I had forgotten how much you can do in RAW

    Quote Originally Posted by george013 View Post
    Maybe Ted can figure out what compressions where used?

    George
    Certainly, George.

    For your images in order of posting, according to JPEGsnoop:

    1 10.57:1, 4:2:0 (2x2)
    2 5.18:1, 4:2:0 (2x2)
    3 24.61:1, 4:2:2 (2x1)
    4 5.04:1, 4:2:0 (2x2)
    5 5.04:1, 4:2:0 (2x2)
    6 11.51:1, 4:2:0 (2x2)

    Best Regards

  2. #82
    DanK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    4,199
    Real Name
    Dan

    Re: A house shot in JPEG. I had forgotten how much you can do in RAW

    A bit pissed about Mike's post saying he did do some tests. He posed some assumptions in it without clarifying what he meant. A wrong way of discussing.
    So here some tests of mine with the explanation.
    I can no longer track what the argument is about, and I find this tone inappropriate. Mods--is it time to shut this thread down?

  3. #83
    Administrator Manfred M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    13,614
    Real Name
    Manfred Mueller

    Re: A house shot in JPEG. I had forgotten how much you can do in RAW

    I agree with Dan here and I would ask the members to be civil to one another in their postings. Quite a number of the latest postings may be of interest to some, but will do little to help Brian and his original question.

    I am shutting this thread down, unless anyone has any objections. If so please PM me if you disagree.

Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •