Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Pictures are always washed out, mandatory post-processing?

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    NY, USA
    Posts
    37
    Real Name
    arthur

    Pictures are always washed out, mandatory post-processing?

    Hi,

    I'm using a canon 1100D without a lens on a microscope.
    My pictures always lack contrast.

    The only thing I can do is act on the lighthing and shutter speed (aperture is fixed by the objective, and I like too keep ISO to 100).

    I found amazing contrasted microscope pictures.

    I wonder, is it because I need to shoot RAW and do some post processing?

    Example : sand from south of France
    Pictures are always washed out, mandatory post-processing?

    Thanks.
    Last edited by Manfred M; 13th January 2017 at 03:15 PM. Reason: Added working link to image

  2. #2
    DanK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    8,633
    Real Name
    Dan

    Re: Pictures are always washed out, mandatory post-processing?

    The amount of contrast is determined primarily by the scene and how it is lighted, not by camera settings. For example, some images have a limited tonal range or a small difference in brightness in the mid-tones, where it is most noticeable. If an image lacks contrast, it is very easy to increase contrast in postprocessing. The basic tools are changing the black and white points (expanding the tonal range if it is limited) and using a curves tool (or a contrast slider) to increase difference in the midtones. Shooting raw in general allows more flexibility in editing, but frankly, for this, I don't think it would matter much.

    If this is new to you, please read the tutorials under "tones and contrast" on the tutorials page of this site. That will give you the fundamentals. After that, people here can help with any specific questions you have.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    northern Virginia suburb of Washington, DC
    Posts
    19,064

    Re: Pictures are always washed out, mandatory post-processing?

    It would be helpful if you would provide a link to an image that is an example of the look you hope to achieve.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    6,956
    Real Name
    Ted

    Re: Pictures are always washed out, mandatory post-processing?

    Yes, some post processing would definitely help the shot. Some prefer RAW, some do not.

    I use RawTherapee . . .

    Pictures are always washed out, mandatory post-processing?
    Last edited by xpatUSA; 13th January 2017 at 06:33 PM.

  5. #5
    Moderator Manfred M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    21,955
    Real Name
    Manfred Mueller

    Re: Pictures are always washed out, mandatory post-processing?

    +1 to Dan's comment.

    Adding contrast has always been a post-processing step. Lighting direction during capture will also add contrast, but that requires a directional light source.


    Pictures are always washed out, mandatory post-processing?

  6. #6

    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    79
    Real Name
    Mike

    Re: Pictures are always washed out, mandatory post-processing?

    While taken through a microscope objective, obviously not transmitted light. So you should have some flexibility in positioning the (indirect) light source, or perhaps using more than one light to increase contrast. Post processing to increase sharpness is obligatory for any digital capture. All software has tools for sharpening, some better than others. Best to work with a raw image.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •