Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Posterity purposes

  1. #1

    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    SE Michigan
    Posts
    4,511
    Real Name
    wm c boyer

    Posterity purposes

    My three adult kids were astounded that I have over 4.5 TB of psd files and that I've never converted
    any of them for print, should they ever want to.

    Am I correct in assuming that there is no way to convert them to sRGB for printing, en mass?
    Is there any type of generic soft-proofing that would satisfy professional printers?

  2. #2
    Moderator Manfred M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    21,955
    Real Name
    Manfred Mueller

    re: Posterity purposes

    Quote Originally Posted by chauncey View Post
    My three adult kids were astounded that I have over 4.5 TB of psd files and that I've never converted
    any of them for print, should they ever want to.

    Am I correct in assuming that there is no way to convert them to sRGB for printing, en mass?
    Is there any type of generic soft-proofing that would satisfy professional printers?
    Photoshop's Image Processor will do what you are asking; it's under the files menu; pick "Scripts" and the first menu item is the "Image Processor". You set your directory and image type (sRGB jpeg, for example) and you can even resize them. As with any level of automation, you get exactly that, each and every file is handled the same way.

    When it comes to "generic soft proofing", that goes against the flow of what soft proofing is all about - seeing if an individual image has any OOG issues. It you are converting to sRGB, soft proofing is almost irrelevant as the sRGB colour space is so small that any commercial photo printer will have a much wider gamut than the image you are planning to print.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    SE Michigan
    Posts
    4,511
    Real Name
    wm c boyer

    re: Posterity purposes

    Are you suggesting that converting to sRGB is unnecessary when submitting an image to a professional printing lab?

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Cambridge, UK
    Posts
    492
    Real Name
    Peter

    re: Posterity purposes

    Talk to your printer, ask what they prefer... and make sure they understand the issues involved; some years ago, one refused Jpeg saying it was compressed and thus A Bad Thing. He wanted me to email him a Tiff, and didn't know the difference between RGB, CMYK and LAB. I went elsewhere.

    For off the shelf and most retail places, they expect sRGB but a pro lab might prefer Adobe RGB etc

    The Tiff in question would have been c.100Mb
    Last edited by proseak; 20th November 2016 at 04:26 PM. Reason: missed a bit

  5. #5
    Moderator Manfred M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    21,955
    Real Name
    Manfred Mueller

    re: Posterity purposes

    Quote Originally Posted by chauncey View Post
    Are you suggesting that converting to sRGB is unnecessary when submitting an image to a professional printing lab?
    Most labs assume sRGB. Some of the better ones handle AdobeRGB. You have to ask and if they don't give you a clear answer, then it is safe to assume that they will print anything as sRGB.

    If they handle AdobeRGB, then ask what file format they want, although most tend to work jpegs only (which can be sRGB or AdobeRGB). Ask the lab for a printer / paper profile for soft proofing (the better ones definitely do that - even Costco has theirs available on line). If they don't do that, find another lab.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    SE Michigan
    Posts
    4,511
    Real Name
    wm c boyer

    re: Posterity purposes

    I should have made myself more clear...I want to convert them to a format to is likely to be acceptable
    to the pro printers ten years down the road.

  7. #7
    Moderator Manfred M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    21,955
    Real Name
    Manfred Mueller

    re: Posterity purposes

    16-bit TIFF would do that, but that won't do anything to reduce your storage space.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •