Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: Adobe DNG

  1. #1
    motordrive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    Seattle, WA USA
    Posts
    24
    Real Name
    John

    Adobe DNG

    Just wondering if anyone uses Adobe DNG to convert a camera raw file to the dng raw file format. If so is there any data loss that takes place in the process. I'm thinking there must be a difference but my 72 year old eyes cannot see it.

  2. #2
    Moderator Manfred M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    21,925
    Real Name
    Manfred Mueller

    Re: Adobe DNG

    There is NO data loss as the dng is just a "wrapper" for the raw data.

  3. #3
    dje's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Brisbane Australia
    Posts
    4,636
    Real Name
    Dave Ellis

    Re: Adobe DNG

    My understanding is that the Adobe DNG converter uses lossless compression, provided that the "Use lossy compression" field is unchecked.

    Dave

  4. #4

    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    amsterdam, netherlands
    Posts
    3,182
    Real Name
    George

    Re: Adobe DNG

    I found a well summary on the net. I didn't read the whole thread. http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/41321715

    Be aware if you look at a RAW-file, you look at the result of the used converter.

    George

  5. #5
    ionian's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Kent, UK
    Posts
    730
    Real Name
    Simon

    Re: Adobe DNG

    Useful info above. I've been using dng for all of my files since I got Lightroom. My thinking was that they are likely to be supported for longer than individual camera files, and I'll want to be able to open them in whatever programme the future throws at us.

  6. #6
    Shadowman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    WNY
    Posts
    36,717
    Real Name
    John

    Re: Adobe DNG

    I use it for one camera which isn't supported by Lightroom yet.

  7. #7
    rpcrowe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Southern California, USA
    Posts
    17,389
    Real Name
    Richard

    Re: Adobe DNG

    I am not crazy about DNG. I cannot put my finger on exactly why but, I seem to get better results keeping my image as a RAW file plus saving a master image as a Photoshop Document PSD, finally using JPEG from which to print. I always have the unaltered RAW file and the master image saved.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    6,956
    Real Name
    Ted

    Re: Adobe DNG

    Quote Originally Posted by motordrive View Post
    Just wondering if anyone uses Adobe's [RAW to?] DNG to convert a camera raw file to the dng raw file format.
    I do not use their converter but images can be saved as DNG from their Camera Raw (ACR).

    If so is there any data loss that takes place in the process. I'm thinking there must be a difference but my 72 year old eyes cannot see it.
    What can be lost is raw file meta-data that doesn't fit the available tags in Adobe's DNG spec, see:

    http://www.adobe.com/content/dam/Ado...ec_1.4.0.0.pdf

    Just for you I just now converted a Sigma SD14 X3F file to DNG and all of the Maker Notes are gone. Some of them may have been put instead in the XMP section of the DNG file's meta-data - certainly the ACR slider settings are in there - but I haven't the patience to compare, sorry.
    Last edited by xpatUSA; 30th May 2016 at 07:27 PM.

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    South Devon, UK
    Posts
    14,401

    Re: Adobe DNG

    What I do, John, is to convert all my Canon Raw files to DNG as I download them using Bridge. They are then stored as ACR basic edited images in DNG format for any further use. The usable images are individually moved across to CC for further work then eventually saved as Psd format.

    DNG isn't really necessary but it is smaller files and without those tagged on extra 'sidecar' files. Maybe a bit time consuming to convert everything including those photos which will be rejected but it saves me confusion by doing the lot in one easy stage. And, in theory, DNG will always remain a universal format after some others may have been phased out.

    At one time, when I had CS5 and purchased a new camera, those files wouldn't open in ACR so I had to do an extra process with the Adobe DNG converter software before getting the images into ACR. So I have continued with that arrangement, although I now set the Bridge options to automatically do the conversion.

  10. #10
    DanK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    8,625
    Real Name
    Dan

    Re: Adobe DNG

    I've never bothered. I don't see any advantage for me.

  11. #11
    Moderator Manfred M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    21,925
    Real Name
    Manfred Mueller

    Re: Adobe DNG

    Quote Originally Posted by DanK View Post
    I've never bothered. I don't see any advantage for me.
    Same here. It forces me to use the Adobe raw converter and I don't always get the best results with it.

  12. #12
    motordrive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    Seattle, WA USA
    Posts
    24
    Real Name
    John

    Re: Adobe DNG

    All good information. When I use my Olympus digital compact camera I have it set to save both RAW and JPG. When I want to use the RAW files I must use DNG as Adobe CS5 does not support this Olympus. When shooting RAW with my D700 I use the built in Nikon converter in CS5. I have been considering using DNG for the D700 as well but still thinking about it. Thanks all for your input. Happy shooting!
    John

  13. #13
    Shadowman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    WNY
    Posts
    36,717
    Real Name
    John

    Re: Adobe DNG

    Quote Originally Posted by motordrive View Post
    All good information. When I use my Olympus digital compact camera I have it set to save both RAW and JPG. When I want to use the RAW files I must use DNG as Adobe CS5 does not support this Olympus. When shooting RAW with my D700 I use the built in Nikon converter in CS5. I have been considering using DNG for the D700 as well but still thinking about it. Thanks all for your input. Happy shooting!
    John
    Just consider it a workaround until the technology catches up.

  14. #14
    Black Pearl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Whitburn, Sunderland
    Posts
    2,422
    Real Name
    Robin

    Re: Adobe DNG

    Personally I don't see the point, its just more work and more time spent for no real world gain.

  15. #15
    Moderator Donald's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Glenfarg, Scotland
    Posts
    21,402
    Real Name
    Just add 'MacKenzie'

    Re: Adobe DNG

    At one time it was thought that dng would take over the world (as everything else from Adobe seeks to do) and that we'd all better get in to saving as dng before the apocalypse.

    Don't see any sign of it happening!

  16. #16

    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    North West of England
    Posts
    7,178
    Real Name
    John

    Re: Adobe DNG

    Quote Originally Posted by rpcrowe View Post
    I am not crazy about DNG. I cannot put my finger on exactly why but, I seem to get better results keeping my image as a RAW file plus saving a master image as a Photoshop Document PSD, finally using JPEG from which to print. I always have the unaltered RAW file and the master image saved.
    Could be to do with the fact that programmes such as PS ACR are to a degree customised to the camera's native raw format. When I first started using Fuji cameras, I was still using CS2 (cheapskate). PS had long since moved on with the result that the CS2 raw converter was not updated for the Fuji RAW format. For a while, I resorted to a DNG conversion so that I could continue to use CS2 but I soon became obvious that the workflow did not de-mosaic the files efficiently and I was left with a faint pattern, particularly in heavy crops. Moving to CS6 cured that (although ACR still wasn't that good initially).

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •