Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Photographic history

  1. #1
    gregj1763's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Launceston Tasmania
    Posts
    1,929
    Real Name
    Greg

    Photographic history

    The owner of the house where I'm working came up to me and said "you like photography, this might interest you"
    To be honest I hadn't heard of the Luzo camera but what a bit of photographic history I held in my hands.
    This is one of the later models 1896 I reckon.
    Unfortunately I wasn't allowed to keep it.

    http://www.earlyphotography.co.uk/site/entry_C270.html

    Photographic history

    Photographic history

    Photographic history

  2. #2
    Moderator Donald's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Glenfarg, Scotland
    Posts
    21,402
    Real Name
    Just add 'MacKenzie'

    Re: Photographic history

    Wonderful.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    2,955
    Real Name
    Ole

    Re: Photographic history

    Greg, thanks for the link. This is great.
    Cheers Ole

  4. #4
    Shadowman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    WNY
    Posts
    36,717
    Real Name
    John

    Re: Photographic history

    Nice.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    northern Virginia suburb of Washington, DC
    Posts
    19,064

    Re: Photographic history

    I looked the camera up in Camera written by Todd Gustavson and published by Sterling Signature. The book explains the camera collection of the George Eastman House and provides drop-dead beautiful photos of them. If you're interested in the history of cameras, I highly recommend the book.

    The book explains that the Luxo was designed to compete with the popular Kodak roll-film camera by offering improvements such as a reflex viewfinder and a different location of the film spools, which allowed for manufacturing a smaller camera.

    An 1889 model is shown but doesn't mention the model name. This particular model used a roll of film that took 100 round pictures. Though the Kodak camera provided film processing by the manufacturer, Luxo didn't provide it. The external shutter of this model was powered by a rubber band. Tension was controlled by a brass slide but the book doesn't explain how many positions the slide could be placed in.

  6. #6
    gregj1763's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Launceston Tasmania
    Posts
    1,929
    Real Name
    Greg

    Re: Photographic history

    Quote Originally Posted by Mike Buckley View Post
    I looked the camera up in Camera written by Todd Gustavson and published by Sterling Signature. The book explains the camera collection of the George Eastman House and provides drop-dead beautiful photos of them. If you're interested in the history of cameras, I highly recommend the book.

    The book explains that the Luxo was designed to compete with the popular Kodak roll-film camera by offering improvements such as a reflex viewfinder and a different location of the film spools, which allowed for manufacturing a smaller camera.

    An 1889 model is shown but doesn't mention the model name. This particular model used a roll of film that took 100 round pictures. Though the Kodak camera provided film processing by the manufacturer, Luxo didn't provide it. The external shutter of this model was powered by a rubber band. Tension was controlled by a brass slide but the book doesn't explain how many positions the slide could be placed in.

    Thanks for the information about the book Mike. I will see if I can find a copy.

  7. #7
    IzzieK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Chesterfield, Missouri/Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    17,827
    Real Name
    Izzie

    Re: Photographic history

    What a shame he cannot part with it...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •