Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 32

Thread: I though i had it nailed, but no!

  1. #1
    marlunn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    South Wales UK
    Posts
    1,612
    Real Name
    Mark

    I though i had it nailed, but no!

    Arghh, though I had this BIF shot nailed but once home and on the computer screen - I can see it was so near, but so far away

    ah well - practice, practice, practice - oh and a bit more light would have helped

    I though i had it nailed, but no!

    would not normally put up failures but C & C on the composition welcome for next time, there is space in the frame all around the bird
    Last edited by marlunn; 15th February 2015 at 05:05 PM.

  2. #2
    Nicks Pics's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Michigan U.S.
    Posts
    1,132
    Real Name
    Nick

    Re: I though i had it nailed, but no!

    I like the composition, the diagonal line of the wings from corner to corner is neat IMO, with the bird's body right in the center.

  3. #3
    marlunn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    South Wales UK
    Posts
    1,612
    Real Name
    Mark

    Re: I though i had it nailed, but no!

    Thanks Nick, was gutted when I saw the head was slightly out of focus, I was playing with auto iso and fixed shutter speed of 1/500, gave me f7.1 and iso 320, on reflection I will try next time with fixed shutter of 1/1000 to get slightly more depth and freeze on the focus

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    North West of England
    Posts
    7,178
    Real Name
    John

    Re: I though i had it nailed, but no!

    Like the composition Mark but the head needs to be sharp IMHO.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    SE Michigan
    Posts
    4,511
    Real Name
    wm c boyer

    Re: I though i had it nailed, but no!

    Aah my friend...tis indeed a rare combination of gear and photographer's technique that allow an
    image such as that to come to fruition. Acceptance of occasional failure is necessary on that journey.

  6. #6
    marlunn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    South Wales UK
    Posts
    1,612
    Real Name
    Mark

    Re: I though i had it nailed, but no!

    John, yep - thats the kicker with this one - close but no coconut
    William, ah indeed sir, now to work on the total requirement for sucess instead of parts of it - and with some 'luck' and minor skill on my part - one day I will suceed !

  7. #7

    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    SE Michigan
    Posts
    4,511
    Real Name
    wm c boyer

    Re: I though i had it nailed, but no!

    FWIW, the folks herein that are good at those BIF things use good, well tuned gear as well as a
    deep knowledge of how to use that gear.

  8. #8
    Nicks Pics's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Michigan U.S.
    Posts
    1,132
    Real Name
    Nick

    Re: I though i had it nailed, but no!

    Maybe indeed it was motion blur more than missed focus!

  9. #9
    Stagecoach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Suva, Fiji
    Posts
    7,075
    Real Name
    Grahame

    Re: I though i had it nailed, but no!

    Nothing wrong with posting failures Mark, we learn from these also.

    I would question whether this is motion blur or focus being off, the 'birders' may spot some clues.

  10. #10
    marlunn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    South Wales UK
    Posts
    1,612
    Real Name
    Mark

    Re: I though i had it nailed, but no!

    Nick, Grahame, I suspect focus as it was flying straight toward me and the wings etc look to be okay so between focusing and the shutter was sufficient time for it to move forward in the frame in front of the focus point

  11. #11
    Nicks Pics's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Michigan U.S.
    Posts
    1,132
    Real Name
    Nick

    Re: I though i had it nailed, but no!

    Shutter lag, perhaps? Still, I think you'll probably do better with 1/1000.

  12. #12
    marlunn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    South Wales UK
    Posts
    1,612
    Real Name
    Mark

    Re: I though i had it nailed, but no!

    yep - I think that was the kicker - I seem to recall that being stated as the starter shutter speed for BIF shots on the forum previously, aint hindsight great

  13. #13
    Shadowman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    WNY
    Posts
    36,717
    Real Name
    John

    Re: I though i had it nailed, but no!

    Nice effort.

  14. #14
    Moderator Dave Humphries's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Windsor, Berks, UK
    Posts
    16,737
    Real Name
    Dave Humphries :)

    Re: I though i had it nailed, but no!

    This is an extremely difficult angle to shoot with such a subject and background Mark,

    If you look carefully, it seems as if the focus is sharp on the wings and tail - which is exactly where the best contrast is for the AF to lock on to. Keeping the AF point actually on the eye/head is difficult enough, but since it is low contrast compared to the wings/tail (against background), the chances of AF success are slim (assuming the AF and lens focus motor can track the speed of approach).

    Well that's what I tell myself to explain my very similar failures
    The engineer in me is comfortable with this theory.

    ... and AF is all about engineering - if it were magic, it might be more reliable at succeeding (with what we want)

  15. #15
    marlunn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    South Wales UK
    Posts
    1,612
    Real Name
    Mark

    Re: I though i had it nailed, but no!

    Dave,

    As an ex-engineer, I can but agree with you, I think the af tracking was on 9 point - next time I will try single point and see what a hash it makes of it on that but I suspect the best option is higher shutter speed, greater DoF and a prayer to divinity of choice with burst mode slected rather than single frame

  16. #16
    Brownbear's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    British Columbia, Canada
    Posts
    7,244
    Real Name
    Christina

    Re: I though i had it nailed, but no!

    Hi Mark,

    Indeed you almost nailed the focus... Very hard to do, especially so with a head on capture and foliage in the background. I believe that even faster shutter speeds are especially helpful for head on captures when the bird is close. I'm sure if I checked the few I've managed they would all show a higher shutter speed than usual. Just to confirm that yes single point auto focus (center point, continous (release on focus only (my preference)) helps immensely especially with foliage in the background.

    Here is a very helpful and informative thread started by Joe whose bird images are truly exquisite.

    Birds In Flight... My Way

  17. #17
    marlunn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    South Wales UK
    Posts
    1,612
    Real Name
    Mark

    Re: I though i had it nailed, but no!

    Thank you Christina, I will take a leisurely read later and look for more opportunities to capture this one properly as I do really like the composition and the light on the wings/tail

  18. #18

    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Alaska
    Posts
    7,604
    Real Name
    Dan

    Re: I though i had it nailed, but no!

    That was definitely a challenging shot, Mark. The background is double trouble. First, it has higher contrast elements than the subject so easier for the camera to lock on the BG. Second it's a messy BG for the final image. Dave has already pointed out that the soft head appears to be a focus issue rather than ss. The first clue is that if there is anything in the image that is sharp, then you can rule out ss. In this case the bird's wings etc. look to be pretty sharp. Not sure what camera body you are shooting. The head OOF can either be due to the focus point being elsewhere on the bird or the camera not having predictive focus. Though with a slow bird like a gull the latter is not likely an issue.

    I'll not get into the debate regarding single vs multipoint focus etc. We all seem to do it differently. Which suggest that results may have more to do with magic/luck than with the technical aspects

    Regarding the composition, a little more room beyond the wingtips might help.

  19. #19
    marlunn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    South Wales UK
    Posts
    1,612
    Real Name
    Mark

    Re: I though i had it nailed, but no!

    Cheers Dan, yep think I will sacrifice first born on a pagan altar before I try that one again

    there is a bit more room around the gull so could include more but given the focus faux pas - wont bother

    Camera is a Nikon D5200 - lens was a Tamron 70-300mm @160mm

  20. #20

    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Philippines
    Posts
    12,181
    Real Name
    Brian

    Re: I though i had it nailed, but no!

    the only thing missing in this shot is just a wee tad of good old fashioned blind luck. You will get it the next time, or maybe the next next time?

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •