Page 1 of 7 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 127

Thread: Lowlight Photography with and without flash

  1. #1
    Shadowman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    WNY
    Posts
    36,717
    Real Name
    John

    Lowlight Photography with and without flash

    Always waiting for the golden hour, then suddenly the night is upon us. What do you normally do, put the camera away, utilize flash, fast lens?

    I created this thread to discuss lowlight shooting with and without flash. What are members opinion, what are your standard techniques, settings? Do you prefer or anticipate subject movement? Black and white examples are not necessary.

    f/4.5, 1/160sec, ISO 1600 90mm, Jul.7:40PM with flash, Nikon D60
    Lowlight Photography with and without flash

    f/2.8, 1/30 sec, ISO 3200, Oct 7:00PM, no flash, Nikon D5200
    Lowlight Photography with and without flash

    both handheld
    Last edited by Shadowman; 19th February 2014 at 01:17 AM. Reason: added text

  2. #2
    DanK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    8,625
    Real Name
    Dan

    Re: Lowlight Photography with and without flash

    I'm not very good at this type of photography, but in my mind, it is as much a matter of the quality of light as the amount of light. One reason that I routinely use flash indoors is that the available light is usually not very good, e.g., leaving eyes shadowed, providing no catch light, etc. Your second shot has some strong horizontal light that brings out detail, not just on the person in the foreground, but also some of the others, e.g, the face farthest to the left. In contrast, the available light in the first one is bad, it seems to me, providing some detail on the clothing but leaving the faces almost entirely shadowed.

    My simple approach to candids in lousy lighting will strike some people as primitive, but it works pretty well indoors. I use a bounced flash, often with a diffuser, and a large bounce card (standard Demb Flip-It). Demb says to use the card mounted on the short edge of the flash so that you can bend it 90 degrees for portrait mode, but I sometimes mount it on the long edge to allow me to alter where the bounced flash goes. If you do that and want to be able to turn it for portrait mode, you need to add a bracket, which I occasionally use.

    Outdoors is tougher: usually no surface on which to bounce. I don't usually end up doing outside candids in low light. I think you might be able to do semi-direct, that is, aim the flash at an angle, but I'll leave this one to someone who does more of it.

  3. #3
    shreds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    London
    Posts
    1,502
    Real Name
    Ian

    Re: Lowlight Photography with and without flash

    John,

    I like the second one, you really caught his action.

    I like available light wherever I can, with whatever reflectors can be used to assist, but invariably if it really is too dark, then I will strategically position some Speedlights to bounce some light into the scene, mounted on Pocket Wizards, but carefully positioned out of shot. Quite a lot depends on the event and what effect you are attempting to achieve?

  4. #4
    Shadowman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    WNY
    Posts
    36,717
    Real Name
    John

    Re: Lowlight Photography with and without flash

    Quote Originally Posted by DanK View Post
    I'm not very good at this type of photography, but in my mind, it is as much a matter of the quality of light as the amount of light. One reason that I routinely use flash indoors is that the available light is usually not very good, e.g., leaving eyes shadowed, providing no catch light, etc. Your second shot has some strong horizontal light that brings out detail, not just on the person in the foreground, but also some of the others, e.g, the face farthest to the left. In contrast, the available light in the first one is bad, it seems to me, providing some detail on the clothing but leaving the faces almost entirely shadowed.

    My simple approach to candids in lousy lighting will strike some people as primitive, but it works pretty well indoors. I use a bounced flash, often with a diffuser, and a large bounce card (standard Demb Flip-It). Demb says to use the card mounted on the short edge of the flash so that you can bend it 90 degrees for portrait mode, but I sometimes mount it on the long edge to allow me to alter where the bounced flash goes. If you do that and want to be able to turn it for portrait mode, you need to add a bracket, which I occasionally use.

    Outdoors is tougher: usually no surface on which to bounce. I don't usually end up doing outside candids in low light. I think you might be able to do semi-direct, that is, aim the flash at an angle, but I'll leave this one to someone who does more of it.
    Dan,

    Thanks for the suggestions. In a lighting situation similar to the first image I will sometimes try to minimize the flash intensity to be able to get some degree of sharpness and acceptable exposure, but it was getting so dark and there was very little artificial light, so it was a choice of using flash to capture a moving subject or accept motion blur. High ISO on the D60 was not much of a help, ISO 1600 was the maximum I could set with acceptable noise.

  5. #5
    Shadowman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    WNY
    Posts
    36,717
    Real Name
    John

    Re: Lowlight Photography with and without flash

    Quote Originally Posted by shreds View Post
    John,

    I like the second one, you really caught his action.

    I like available light wherever I can, with whatever reflectors can be used to assist, but invariably if it really is too dark, then I will strategically position some Speedlights to bounce some light into the scene, mounted on Pocket Wizards, but carefully positioned out of shot. Quite a lot depends on the event and what effect you are attempting to achieve?
    Hi Ian,

    The available light was what really helped me capture the second image. I could have increased ISO up to 6400 or used Hi ISO setting but doing so and then using in-camera noise reduction limits the number of shots I can take consecutively. With the settings I used for the second image, I was able to take at least three images without waiting for the camera to fully capture the exposure.

  6. #6
    Shadowman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    WNY
    Posts
    36,717
    Real Name
    John

    Re: Lowlight Photography with and without flash

    f/2.8, ISO 640, 40mm, 1/60s no flash, 7:10pm, December. Handheld

    Lowlight Photography with and without flash

  7. #7
    Moderator Manfred M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    21,925
    Real Name
    Manfred Mueller

    Re: Lowlight Photography with and without flash

    f/2.8; 1/60th sec ISO 3200 70mm focal length with and APS-C sensor

    Lowlight Photography with and without flash

  8. #8

    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    SE Michigan
    Posts
    4,511
    Real Name
    wm c boyer

    Re: Lowlight Photography with and without flash

    Your own IQ standards coupled with your gear's ISO ability are the only factors to consider...
    sans external lighting.

  9. #9
    Shadowman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    WNY
    Posts
    36,717
    Real Name
    John

    Re: Lowlight Photography with and without flash

    Quote Originally Posted by chauncey View Post
    Your own IQ standards coupled with your gear's ISO ability are the only factors to consider...
    sans external lighting.
    I've been reading Lance Keimeg's "Night Photography: Finding Your Way in the Dark" and according to him, if it moves and you don't have adequate lighting, "forget about it".

  10. #10
    Shadowman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    WNY
    Posts
    36,717
    Real Name
    John

    Re: Lowlight Photography with and without flash

    Quote Originally Posted by GrumpyDiver View Post
    f/2.8; 1/60th sec ISO 3200 70mm focal length with and APS-C sensor

    Lowlight Photography with and without flash
    If the sky is blue, we've still got a chance. Nice image.

  11. #11
    rpcrowe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Southern California, USA
    Posts
    17,389
    Real Name
    Richard

    "I always use available light"

    ...and my flash is always available!

  12. #12
    Shadowman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    WNY
    Posts
    36,717
    Real Name
    John

    Re: "I always use available light"

    Quote Originally Posted by rpcrowe View Post
    ...and my flash is always available!
    As a last resort of course, unless the use of flash was your original intention

  13. #13

    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Lahore, Pakistan
    Posts
    225
    Real Name
    Lukas Werth

    Re: "I always use available light"

    I never use a flash. Any picture which would necessitate that would not be worth exposing for me. Natural light or nothing.

    Lukas
    Last edited by lukaswerth; 20th February 2014 at 05:13 PM.

  14. #14

    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    SE Michigan
    Posts
    4,511
    Real Name
    wm c boyer

    Re: "I always use available light"

    I've been reading Lance Keimeg's "Night Photography: Finding Your Way in the Dark" and according to him, if it moves and you don't have adequate lighting, "forget about it".
    There are those that would disagree, but IMHO, unless it's a learning experience, if I won't print it, I won't shoot it.

  15. #15
    Shadowman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    WNY
    Posts
    36,717
    Real Name
    John

    Re: "I always use available light"

    Quote Originally Posted by lukaswerth View Post
    I never use a flash. Any picture which would necessitate that would not be worth exposing for me. Natural light or nothing.

    Lukas
    Lukas,

    It may not be natural but it's not unheard of to use other light sources in still or motion picture capture. Soem photographers use multiple light sources, multiple technicians just for a series of photos.

  16. #16
    Moderator Manfred M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    21,925
    Real Name
    Manfred Mueller

    Re: "I always use available light"

    Quote Originally Posted by lukaswerth View Post
    I never use a flash. Any picture which would necessitate that would not be worth exposing for me. Natural light or nothing.
    Lukas
    All I can say is that you are limiting your photographic opportunities by sticking with existing light, but of course that is certainly your choice.

    I generally do a decent amount of flash photography because, it is difficult to produce a good image without quality light. Much of what I use flash for is fill light, rather than as the main light source. I guess my use of flash goes back to my early days of film shooting where film speeds ran between ISO 25 and 400, so "adding more light" was more important than with the ludicrously fast ISO speeds available now.

  17. #17
    Shadowman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    WNY
    Posts
    36,717
    Real Name
    John

    Re: "I always use available light"

    Quote Originally Posted by chauncey View Post
    There are those that would disagree, but IMHO, unless it's a learning experience, if I won't print it, I won't shoot it.
    William,

    He did offer methods to achieve the shot, it just involved elaborate setups. And his idea of movement is more than just slight flinch, he was referring to deliberate movement. And yes it is a learning experience and I would like to print it.

  18. #18
    dabhand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    North Yorks
    Posts
    523
    Real Name
    steve

    Re: "I always use available light"

    Quote Originally Posted by lukaswerth View Post
    I never use a flash. Any picture which would necessitate that would not be worth exposing for me. Natural light or nothing.

    Lukas
    Lukas,

    I've just been reading an article about Timothy Allen - current Travel Photographer Of The Year - and he has very much the same view as yourself - I find that easy to agree with when I'm shooting landscapes but I think I'd be pushed when shooting fine technical detail.

    Regarding John's comment re "Some photographers use multiple light sources, multiple technicians just for a series of photos" - in another magazine there was an article about a shoot for a new car which used 24 technicians and 4 lighting rigs, a body double, 4 different locations and stacks of post processing to make a composite image - not photography as my limited means understands it.

    steve

  19. #19

    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Dunedin New Zealand
    Posts
    2,697
    Real Name
    J stands for John

    Re: "I always use available light"

    Quote Originally Posted by lukaswerth View Post
    I never use a flash. Any picture which would necessitate that would not be worth exposing for me. Natural light or nothing.Lukas
    For years with film and 100 ISO it was flash or nothing .... now with high ISO and adequate results its a whole new ball game.

  20. #20

    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Dunedin New Zealand
    Posts
    2,697
    Real Name
    J stands for John

    Re: "I always use available light"

    Quote Originally Posted by dabhand View Post
    Lukas,

    #18 - not photography as my limited means understands it.

    steve
    I have been aware for some time it is mainly my laziness and lack of innitiative that prevents me from emulating such activities as resort deprived amateurs for years have been doing comparable things. The problem is myself not my lack of equipment

Page 1 of 7 123 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •