Color managed vs unmanaged: Before and After
So I finally bit the bullet and got myself a ColorMunki and a Gretag Macbeth Color Checker so I can have a color managed workflow :D. Does anyone know a way I can do a before/after comparison (preferably with the click of a button) so I can see if my investment was worth it?
Re: Color managed vs unmanaged: Before and After
Quote:
Originally Posted by
KentDub
So I finally bit the bullet and got myself a ColorMunki and a Gretag Macbeth Color Checker so I can have a color managed workflow :D. Does anyone know a way I can do a before/after comparison (preferably with the click of a button) so I can see if my investment was worth it?
I don't know about ColorMunki (where oh where do they get these names from), but Spyder software has a before/after button at the end of the profiling procedure. Personally, I just assign the resulting profile as the default system profile - and I do see a small change as it clicks in - you could always do that and then change it for the default profile and look for differences.
Re: Color managed vs unmanaged: Before and After
Lol!
http://backup.cambridgeincolour.com/...eforeAfter.png
So the results: Night and day difference!
I don't think I like the ambient light correction, as I have gotten used to it being super bright, it seems very dim now. Looking at the color bars from the before/after image I definatly have a far better response.
I lost a lot of contrast, which makes my photos look better, but normal programs look worse. I used to run my LCD at 70%, but reset it to 50% for the calibration per the instructions.
It got rid of a slight blue tint the screen had, and greys look much more neutral.
So I'll use it for a bit, I'll have to re-examin my photo library. I always thought my monitor was calibrated pretty well... Maybe it was for office applications - but definatly not for photos! Worth every cent! :D
Re: Color managed vs unmanaged: Before and After
Quote:
Originally Posted by
KentDub
So I gotta ask: Has anyone else had such night-day experiences with calibration devices?
To be honest, I hear of similar stories to yours quite often - the big problem of course is until you've been down that path "you don't know what you don't know" (in terms of how things are looking) and I suspect that many people are seeing images far different to how they should look (both in terms of people creating them and others viewing them) - so I think it's a very positive thing that we're raising awareness of the issue here and several have now "bitten the bullet" and bought a colorimeter.
Just a small point to keep in mind ...
"Calibration" and "Profiling" are different things; Calibration is essentially a monitor hardware adjustment to get colour temperature, black, and white points where they should be whereas profiling "picks up the slack" by loading a translation table into your video card. Calibration is important for two reasons: (1) it gives you the best chance of having (sRGB) images view correctly in non-colourmanaged environments (like Internet Explorer) and (2) the closer the calibration the less number of potential levels that are unavailable to the profile to make corrections (in a worst case scenario if the calibration was WAAAY off you could end up with banding issues). In short - if you can adjust the hardware so that the software doesn't have to do anything then it's a good thing :)